IU CIBER truly embraces its role as a national resource center, ensuring that resources and opportunities are made available to the widest audience possible when addressing the leading research in international business education. Our activities are directed toward moving all constituencies from international awareness, to engagement, and to global competence through the provision of international education, collaborative and mentorship relationships, and experiential learning.
CIBER Events
There are no events at this time.
CIBER Focus tackles topics impacting international business and international business education.
Description of the video:
WEBVTT 1 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.470 [MUSIC PLAYING] 2 00:00:03.470 --> 00:00:34.720 3 00:00:34.720 --> 00:00:35.460 Greetings. 4 00:00:35.460 --> 00:00:37.240 Welcome to CIBER Focus, your source 5 00:00:37.240 --> 00:00:38.880 for international business information. 6 00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:40.660 I'm your host, Ryan Craven. 7 00:00:40.660 --> 00:00:43.360 And our guest today is Professor Andrew Libby. 8 00:00:43.360 --> 00:00:46.040 Andrew Libby is the assistant director of the human biology 9 00:00:46.040 --> 00:00:47.200 program at IU. 10 00:00:47.200 --> 00:00:49.240 This program is an interdisciplinary major 11 00:00:49.240 --> 00:00:51.040 in the College of Arts and Sciences 12 00:00:51.040 --> 00:00:52.840 that explores the complex human dimensions 13 00:00:52.840 --> 00:00:54.777 of scientific inquiry. 14 00:00:54.777 --> 00:00:56.360 His current teaching interests revolve 15 00:00:56.360 --> 00:00:59.320 around poverty, globalization, and the role 16 00:00:59.320 --> 00:01:01.950 of global financial institutions like the World Bank, 17 00:01:01.950 --> 00:01:04.670 International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization, 18 00:01:04.670 --> 00:01:07.710 in international development and emerging markets. 19 00:01:07.710 --> 00:01:10.222 Prior to this position in the HUBI, 20 00:01:10.222 --> 00:01:12.430 Andrew served as the community engagement coordinator 21 00:01:12.430 --> 00:01:14.450 for the IU service learning program. 22 00:01:14.450 --> 00:01:16.850 And he has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary, 23 00:01:16.850 --> 00:01:18.950 experiential teaching, and learning. 24 00:01:18.950 --> 00:01:20.510 Andrew, thanks for being here. 25 00:01:20.510 --> 00:01:22.990 So you're getting ready to teach the intensive freshman 26 00:01:22.990 --> 00:01:26.190 seminar course food for thought, food policy 27 00:01:26.190 --> 00:01:28.070 from local to global. 28 00:01:28.070 --> 00:01:31.890 What is that intensive seminar style? 29 00:01:31.890 --> 00:01:34.265 And then tell us a bit about that program. 30 00:01:34.265 --> 00:01:36.390 [ANDREW LIBBY] Yeah, the intensive freshman seminar 31 00:01:36.390 --> 00:01:40.550 program is a really, I think, unique, I think, neat program 32 00:01:40.550 --> 00:01:46.790 here at IU where incoming freshmen will come in and take 33 00:01:46.790 --> 00:01:47.970 a seminar class. 34 00:01:47.970 --> 00:01:51.070 It's usually about two and a half to three weeks. 35 00:01:51.070 --> 00:01:53.370 And you can take it on a variety of topics. 36 00:01:53.370 --> 00:01:59.150 There are maybe 20 or 20 plus intensive freshman seminars 37 00:01:59.150 --> 00:02:04.900 offered from disciplines all across the university. 38 00:02:04.900 --> 00:02:08.259 And the topics range wildly. 39 00:02:08.259 --> 00:02:10.600 My class is called Food for Thought. 40 00:02:10.600 --> 00:02:13.580 And I'm part of the human biology program in the College 41 00:02:13.580 --> 00:02:15.220 of Arts and Sciences. 42 00:02:15.220 --> 00:02:19.340 My class is on industrialization of food and its effects 43 00:02:19.340 --> 00:02:21.300 locally and globally. 44 00:02:21.300 --> 00:02:23.140 Awesome. 45 00:02:23.140 --> 00:02:27.420 What makes this topic so interesting to you? 46 00:02:27.420 --> 00:02:30.860 Yeah, that's a good question. 47 00:02:30.860 --> 00:02:33.840 I actually came by this in a winding way. 48 00:02:33.840 --> 00:02:36.560 I was mainly interested in globalization. 49 00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:39.580 I was interested in the role of the International Monetary 50 00:02:39.580 --> 00:02:44.140 Fund and the structural adjustment programs 51 00:02:44.140 --> 00:02:46.680 that they broker with developing nations. 52 00:02:46.680 --> 00:02:50.080 And I just was looking at the flows of capital. 53 00:02:50.080 --> 00:02:52.260 And it seemed to me that they were replicating 54 00:02:52.260 --> 00:02:56.420 the time of colonialism where developing nations were paying 55 00:02:56.420 --> 00:03:02.450 huge amounts of debt to their creditors, which were mainly 56 00:03:02.450 --> 00:03:04.110 developed nations. 57 00:03:04.110 --> 00:03:07.970 And I started to see how that had a really negative effect 58 00:03:07.970 --> 00:03:11.410 on farmers, subsistence farmers, especially 59 00:03:11.410 --> 00:03:14.450 in some of the poorest nations on the Earth. 60 00:03:14.450 --> 00:03:19.630 And these policies seemed, if not designed intentionally, 61 00:03:19.630 --> 00:03:25.270 although designed intentionally, to squeeze these economies. 62 00:03:25.270 --> 00:03:28.450 And it depleted their infrastructure 63 00:03:28.450 --> 00:03:33.050 and made it really difficult to be a farmer in these nations. 64 00:03:33.050 --> 00:03:37.770 And that might not matter so much in the United States 65 00:03:37.770 --> 00:03:39.030 because, who's a farmer? 66 00:03:39.030 --> 00:03:41.610 We have, I don't know, 2 million farmers. 67 00:03:41.610 --> 00:03:44.250 Two percent of the population, I think. 68 00:03:44.250 --> 00:03:45.470 Maybe my math isn't so good. 69 00:03:45.470 --> 00:03:48.730 But, I think, it's 2% of the population are farmers now. 70 00:03:48.730 --> 00:03:51.290 But in developing nations, you have sometimes upwards 71 00:03:51.290 --> 00:03:54.610 of 60% or 70% of the population engaged 72 00:03:54.610 --> 00:03:56.570 in subsistence agriculture. 73 00:03:56.570 --> 00:03:58.950 And a lot of times these are women. 74 00:03:58.950 --> 00:04:01.720 So these are issues that really affect food. 75 00:04:01.720 --> 00:04:04.320 And globalization really affect people in poverty and women 76 00:04:04.320 --> 00:04:04.980 in poverty. 77 00:04:04.980 --> 00:04:07.880 And so I thought that was an interesting topic 78 00:04:07.880 --> 00:04:11.720 to start to think about. 79 00:04:11.720 --> 00:04:16.399 Were there any standouts that really blew your mind 80 00:04:16.399 --> 00:04:19.200 or just was a wow factor when you initially 81 00:04:19.200 --> 00:04:24.200 started taking this approach with really the food lens? 82 00:04:24.200 --> 00:04:26.160 Yeah, there were two books. 83 00:04:26.160 --> 00:04:29.080 Are you just asking about books, or other texts, 84 00:04:29.080 --> 00:04:31.600 or experiences I've had? 85 00:04:31.600 --> 00:04:34.160 Yeah, really just whatever. 86 00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:36.660 Something you came across and it was just really eye-opening 87 00:04:36.660 --> 00:04:40.800 and piqued that interest even more. 88 00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:44.040 Yeah, two books really. 89 00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:47.340 One, I don't know if you know Joseph Stiglitz. 90 00:04:47.340 --> 00:04:48.780 He's an economist. 91 00:04:48.780 --> 00:04:54.080 He was the chairman of Clinton's Council of Economic Advisors. 92 00:04:54.080 --> 00:04:55.220 He's no chump. 93 00:04:55.220 --> 00:04:58.240 He's got a Nobel Prize in economics. 94 00:04:58.240 --> 00:05:00.790 He teaches at Princeton. 95 00:05:00.790 --> 00:05:04.230 And really he wrote a book called Globalization 96 00:05:04.230 --> 00:05:05.570 and Its Discontents. 97 00:05:05.570 --> 00:05:11.110 And it was published in 2001 maybe, something like that. 98 00:05:11.110 --> 00:05:16.830 And he really explained in an accessible way, 99 00:05:16.830 --> 00:05:19.950 for someone like me who was new to the topic of 21st century 100 00:05:19.950 --> 00:05:25.070 globalization, what structural adjustment programs were, 101 00:05:25.070 --> 00:05:29.250 how they operated, historically what they emerged from, 102 00:05:29.250 --> 00:05:31.650 which is something called the Washington Consensus, 103 00:05:31.650 --> 00:05:34.910 which was something developed by Ronald Reagan and Margaret 104 00:05:34.910 --> 00:05:38.790 Thatcher in the '80s. 105 00:05:38.790 --> 00:05:43.510 And it was part of a general global push to liberalize trade 106 00:05:43.510 --> 00:05:46.170 and to encourage globalization. 107 00:05:46.170 --> 00:05:52.830 I think the enactment of NAFTA, the WTO in the '90s followed 108 00:05:52.830 --> 00:05:54.010 logically from this. 109 00:05:54.010 --> 00:05:55.910 But there was a little bit of a dark side 110 00:05:55.910 --> 00:05:58.570 to the story of, like, happy globalization. 111 00:05:58.570 --> 00:06:00.540 And so Stiglitz pointed that out. 112 00:06:00.540 --> 00:06:02.680 But I thought he did it in a even-handed way. 113 00:06:02.680 --> 00:06:04.660 He didn't-- 114 00:06:04.660 --> 00:06:07.080 He talked about some of the triumphs of globalization, 115 00:06:07.080 --> 00:06:10.560 as well as some of the negative consequences of it. 116 00:06:10.560 --> 00:06:12.320 And he used a really interesting phrase. 117 00:06:12.320 --> 00:06:16.240 He said, like, globalization is like, it's a neutral term. 118 00:06:16.240 --> 00:06:18.280 He's like, it's not a good term or a bad term. 119 00:06:18.280 --> 00:06:20.380 You can have good globalization and you 120 00:06:20.380 --> 00:06:22.160 can have bad globalization. 121 00:06:22.160 --> 00:06:23.660 I thought that was interesting. 122 00:06:23.660 --> 00:06:31.340 And I think the food system is an example of bad globalization 123 00:06:31.340 --> 00:06:36.320 because it's driven by perverse economic incentives. 124 00:06:36.320 --> 00:06:40.380 It's a market system that's dominated by subsidies 125 00:06:40.380 --> 00:06:41.487 from Western nations. 126 00:06:41.487 --> 00:06:43.320 And I usually think about the United States, 127 00:06:43.320 --> 00:06:46.000 but you could also think about the European Union as well. 128 00:06:46.000 --> 00:06:50.820 And these are the most developed economic regions of the globe. 129 00:06:50.820 --> 00:06:54.740 They're the ones that subsidize the agricultural most heavily. 130 00:06:54.740 --> 00:06:57.880 And this really distorts the market in a lot of ways, 131 00:06:57.880 --> 00:07:00.650 both in terms of what ends up on our plate here 132 00:07:00.650 --> 00:07:03.610 in Bloomington, Indiana, as well as 133 00:07:03.610 --> 00:07:06.410 the opportunity for people in developing nations in emerging 134 00:07:06.410 --> 00:07:13.450 markets to have a successful, secure food system that's 135 00:07:13.450 --> 00:07:19.450 localized and not so vulnerable to exogenous shocks 136 00:07:19.450 --> 00:07:21.810 on a globalized supply chain. 137 00:07:21.810 --> 00:07:24.110 And so that was one book. 138 00:07:24.110 --> 00:07:25.690 So Stiglitz was amazing. 139 00:07:25.690 --> 00:07:26.670 He's just amazing. 140 00:07:26.670 --> 00:07:27.590 And he's an economist. 141 00:07:27.590 --> 00:07:29.632 He could have written a book filled with formulas 142 00:07:29.632 --> 00:07:31.310 that nobody can understand. 143 00:07:31.310 --> 00:07:33.970 But he didn't-- he wrote a book that and I think he really 144 00:07:33.970 --> 00:07:37.770 wanted people to see this. 145 00:07:37.770 --> 00:07:42.650 And then Michael Pollan, who's a very popular author, journalism 146 00:07:42.650 --> 00:07:46.410 professor, and food writer at Berkeley, 147 00:07:46.410 --> 00:07:50.130 at UC Berkeley, who actually came and spoke at IU a few years 148 00:07:50.130 --> 00:07:52.690 ago, was an interesting talk. 149 00:07:52.690 --> 00:07:55.090 He wrote a book called The Omnivore's Dilemma, which 150 00:07:55.090 --> 00:07:56.170 I read. 151 00:07:56.170 --> 00:07:59.020 And the premise of his book is so interesting. 152 00:07:59.020 --> 00:08:03.240 He basically says, gee, I wonder what's in my food. 153 00:08:03.240 --> 00:08:05.240 And he looked at the ingredients. 154 00:08:05.240 --> 00:08:07.680 I can't actually tell what's in my food. 155 00:08:07.680 --> 00:08:08.180 Who knows? 156 00:08:08.180 --> 00:08:10.320 So he did an investigation to figure out, 157 00:08:10.320 --> 00:08:14.320 what's in his McDonald's Big Mac and Coke? 158 00:08:14.320 --> 00:08:15.900 And it turns out that a lot of this, 159 00:08:15.900 --> 00:08:20.960 a lot of the answer to that was most of the ingredients 160 00:08:20.960 --> 00:08:23.940 are based, are corn- and soy-based. 161 00:08:23.940 --> 00:08:27.383 And so he-- his book helped explain to me something 162 00:08:27.383 --> 00:08:28.800 that was right in front of my face 163 00:08:28.800 --> 00:08:31.520 that didn't make any sense to me, which is, who in the world 164 00:08:31.520 --> 00:08:33.559 is eating all this corn? 165 00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:35.320 Well, I live in Indiana. 166 00:08:35.320 --> 00:08:37.960 And I see corn every time I leave Bloomington 167 00:08:37.960 --> 00:08:40.340 and go 30 miles in any direction. 168 00:08:40.340 --> 00:08:42.360 There's nothing but corn and soy fields. 169 00:08:42.360 --> 00:08:43.780 I only eat a little bit of corn. 170 00:08:43.780 --> 00:08:44.820 So who's eating it all? 171 00:08:44.820 --> 00:08:48.920 So Pollan explained how the system works, how corn is just 172 00:08:48.920 --> 00:08:53.360 a commodity crop that can just be taken apart and reassembled 173 00:08:53.360 --> 00:08:57.400 in all of these amazing formulations 174 00:08:57.400 --> 00:08:59.950 that you see on the back of all the processed food 175 00:08:59.950 --> 00:09:03.070 that you like, dextrose and this stuff 176 00:09:03.070 --> 00:09:06.170 and sorbate and xanthan gum and all that. 177 00:09:06.170 --> 00:09:07.210 That's all corn. 178 00:09:07.210 --> 00:09:11.250 And so Pollan puts it all together on the domestic front. 179 00:09:11.250 --> 00:09:14.470 So all of a sudden, I started to see Pollan and Stiglitz coming 180 00:09:14.470 --> 00:09:15.670 together. 181 00:09:15.670 --> 00:09:17.990 And that was really interesting. 182 00:09:17.990 --> 00:09:19.940 And then I worked at the food bank. 183 00:09:19.940 --> 00:09:22.190 And so I saw people who didn't have enough food to eat 184 00:09:22.190 --> 00:09:24.250 or who had plenty of food to eat, 185 00:09:24.250 --> 00:09:26.190 but it was all terrible for them. 186 00:09:26.190 --> 00:09:29.310 And I started to think about poor people and their diet 187 00:09:29.310 --> 00:09:33.347 and the obesity rates as it affects people in poverty 188 00:09:33.347 --> 00:09:35.430 and starting to think about how our food system is 189 00:09:35.430 --> 00:09:37.870 a huge set of trade offs. 190 00:09:37.870 --> 00:09:42.230 And so that intersection between food globalization and poverty 191 00:09:42.230 --> 00:09:47.510 emerged from that nexus of texts and experience. 192 00:09:47.510 --> 00:09:53.910 Well, and you mentioned it too that so much of the populations 193 00:09:53.910 --> 00:09:56.790 in some of these areas and markets 194 00:09:56.790 --> 00:09:59.980 is in the agricultural side and the food side. 195 00:09:59.980 --> 00:10:03.180 And so when you look at it in those terms too, 196 00:10:03.180 --> 00:10:06.740 this conversation is such a huge economic impact 197 00:10:06.740 --> 00:10:11.220 for those regions and areas getting back to what's grown 198 00:10:11.220 --> 00:10:12.000 and why. 199 00:10:12.000 --> 00:10:14.660 And so much of it is determined by factors 200 00:10:14.660 --> 00:10:18.000 that aren't necessarily the local environment. 201 00:10:18.000 --> 00:10:22.360 Is this the right food for really everybody to be eating 202 00:10:22.360 --> 00:10:24.820 and beyond nutrition? 203 00:10:24.820 --> 00:10:28.645 Are there any key policies or any part 204 00:10:28.645 --> 00:10:30.020 of that process that really stand 205 00:10:30.020 --> 00:10:32.180 out, that showcase that for you? 206 00:10:32.180 --> 00:10:32.700 Yeah. 207 00:10:32.700 --> 00:10:35.900 I mean, to me, the prime mover in the whole system 208 00:10:35.900 --> 00:10:36.960 is subsidies. 209 00:10:36.960 --> 00:10:38.680 So much goes back to subsidies. 210 00:10:38.680 --> 00:10:43.340 We subsidize our agribusinesses to the tune of $20 billion 211 00:10:43.340 --> 00:10:46.100 a year. 212 00:10:46.100 --> 00:10:49.020 And what that gets us, what we're 213 00:10:49.020 --> 00:10:51.780 paying for there is the overproduction 214 00:10:51.780 --> 00:10:57.530 of just a small select set of crops like corn, soy, wheat, 215 00:10:57.530 --> 00:10:59.650 rice, and cotton. 216 00:10:59.650 --> 00:11:06.970 And so we get the processed food that comes 217 00:11:06.970 --> 00:11:09.990 from those basic ingredients. 218 00:11:09.990 --> 00:11:14.330 But if we subsidize something different, 219 00:11:14.330 --> 00:11:19.790 if we subsidize tomatoes, we'd have a lot of tomatoes. 220 00:11:19.790 --> 00:11:22.610 If we subsidize the things that were healthy and are 221 00:11:22.610 --> 00:11:26.730 good for us, then we would have those things 222 00:11:26.730 --> 00:11:30.030 more available to us at a cheaper price. 223 00:11:30.030 --> 00:11:32.010 And the stuff, the stuff that's bad 224 00:11:32.010 --> 00:11:35.930 for us would be more expensive. 225 00:11:35.930 --> 00:11:37.150 But you don't see it. 226 00:11:37.150 --> 00:11:40.970 That's why they can add 79 ounces of Coke 227 00:11:40.970 --> 00:11:47.450 to your cup for an extra penny because the raw ingredient, 228 00:11:47.450 --> 00:11:50.840 high fructose corn syrup, is nothing, 229 00:11:50.840 --> 00:11:53.370 nothing on the dollar, pennies on the dollar. 230 00:11:53.370 --> 00:11:57.200 And so it would be great if we reoriented our federal subsidy 231 00:11:57.200 --> 00:11:58.020 system. 232 00:11:58.020 --> 00:12:01.440 A lot of these questions are questions of poverty. 233 00:12:01.440 --> 00:12:04.580 I mean, people eat what they can afford, so. 234 00:12:04.580 --> 00:12:08.580 But that's an appealing part of the food system to me too, 235 00:12:08.580 --> 00:12:10.920 is this is an area of poverty that I 236 00:12:10.920 --> 00:12:13.960 think if we thought about our priorities 237 00:12:13.960 --> 00:12:17.200 and we prioritize public health, I think we could 238 00:12:17.200 --> 00:12:18.860 have an effect on the system. 239 00:12:18.860 --> 00:12:22.560 This is not an intractable impossible problem. 240 00:12:22.560 --> 00:12:26.760 This is the problem with good, good potential solutions 241 00:12:26.760 --> 00:12:31.640 all oriented around trying to localize our food system just 242 00:12:31.640 --> 00:12:32.960 a little bit more. 243 00:12:32.960 --> 00:12:37.280 We don't all have to survive on berries and twigs. 244 00:12:37.280 --> 00:12:43.120 But we've got a system that's really, really industrialized. 245 00:12:43.120 --> 00:12:45.320 And we could probably do a little bit 246 00:12:45.320 --> 00:12:50.080 of shifting back towards the way the food system used to be. 247 00:12:50.080 --> 00:12:52.960 But one of the obstacles to that is 248 00:12:52.960 --> 00:12:55.720 that we pay not very much for our food now. 249 00:12:55.720 --> 00:13:00.370 We pay just 12% of our annual income as a household for food. 250 00:13:00.370 --> 00:13:04.230 Whereas 50, 75 years ago we paid a third of our income. 251 00:13:04.230 --> 00:13:07.930 So we get what we pay for nowadays. 252 00:13:07.930 --> 00:13:11.430 We get an excess of unhealthy abundance. 253 00:13:11.430 --> 00:13:14.030 Yeah, does uh, we kinda thought-- been circling around 254 00:13:14.030 --> 00:13:15.130 a little bit. 255 00:13:15.130 --> 00:13:18.310 But you're starting to see a little bit more 256 00:13:18.310 --> 00:13:21.870 of a trend towards locally sourced food 257 00:13:21.870 --> 00:13:25.510 and eating what your local farmers and your environment 258 00:13:25.510 --> 00:13:28.150 can produce in your own regions. 259 00:13:28.150 --> 00:13:30.910 Is that kinda the right direction? 260 00:13:30.910 --> 00:13:31.930 That's amazing. 261 00:13:31.930 --> 00:13:34.350 That's what we should-- that'd be great. 262 00:13:34.350 --> 00:13:36.670 Circling back over to the policy piece of it 263 00:13:36.670 --> 00:13:40.113 a little bit, what gets made, and you've 264 00:13:40.113 --> 00:13:41.530 spoken to it a little bit already, 265 00:13:41.530 --> 00:13:47.510 but the international trade factor of the food policy 266 00:13:47.510 --> 00:13:50.910 and kind of its influence, do you 267 00:13:50.910 --> 00:13:58.580 think that the current COVID, situation showcases that value, 268 00:13:58.580 --> 00:14:02.860 the benefits of that locally sourced food? 269 00:14:02.860 --> 00:14:05.140 I don't know. 270 00:14:05.140 --> 00:14:09.020 I mean, I've been looking at newspaper articles 271 00:14:09.020 --> 00:14:11.260 or just whatever's on my newsfeed 272 00:14:11.260 --> 00:14:13.580 and trying to see if there seem like there are 273 00:14:13.580 --> 00:14:15.740 stories about food shortages. 274 00:14:15.740 --> 00:14:17.700 And I have not really seen anything 275 00:14:17.700 --> 00:14:21.220 like that anywhere across the globe. 276 00:14:21.220 --> 00:14:24.020 So I have not seen the-- 277 00:14:24.020 --> 00:14:29.320 COVID has not disrupted markets in any way that I've noticed. 278 00:14:29.320 --> 00:14:36.820 But I think what can happen is countries 279 00:14:36.820 --> 00:14:39.380 that don't have a strong agricultural sector, that they 280 00:14:39.380 --> 00:14:43.060 rely too heavily on imports because their own sector has 281 00:14:43.060 --> 00:14:44.360 been-- 282 00:14:44.360 --> 00:14:46.380 agricultural sector has been made 283 00:14:46.380 --> 00:14:53.500 uncompetitive or urban-biased policies and commodity dumping 284 00:14:53.500 --> 00:14:54.620 and things like that. 285 00:14:54.620 --> 00:14:57.430 Then if there is a problem in the supply chain like, 286 00:14:57.430 --> 00:15:00.290 I guess not COVID, but I'm thinking more 287 00:15:00.290 --> 00:15:08.210 like climate-related problems, droughts, fires, floods. 288 00:15:08.210 --> 00:15:10.050 And there was a really interesting story 289 00:15:10.050 --> 00:15:11.967 from a while ago from the Wall Street Journal. 290 00:15:11.967 --> 00:15:18.130 It's like 2010, there was a heat wave across the wheat 291 00:15:18.130 --> 00:15:19.890 belt in Russia. 292 00:15:19.890 --> 00:15:24.090 So whatever part of Russia, it is some part to the West 293 00:15:24.090 --> 00:15:25.407 where they grow lots of wheat. 294 00:15:25.407 --> 00:15:27.490 So Russia just kept all their wheat to themselves. 295 00:15:27.490 --> 00:15:30.170 So they didn't have as much to export. 296 00:15:30.170 --> 00:15:36.410 So countries that were dependent on Russian wheat exports all 297 00:15:36.410 --> 00:15:41.950 of a sudden found themselves very vulnerable to shortages. 298 00:15:41.950 --> 00:15:48.330 And in that case, you did see price spikes and riots and food 299 00:15:48.330 --> 00:15:53.590 riots, I think, in places pretty far away from Russia. 300 00:15:53.590 --> 00:15:57.980 I mean down in, I think, in Africa, North Africa. 301 00:15:57.980 --> 00:16:01.760 So I think, in terms of policy, it's 302 00:16:01.760 --> 00:16:07.960 probably good as international development policy for us 303 00:16:07.960 --> 00:16:12.040 to help developing nations build infrastructure 304 00:16:12.040 --> 00:16:19.200 that they need to have a strong agricultural sector. 305 00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:22.360 So we don't do that, as far as I know, 306 00:16:22.360 --> 00:16:26.000 going back to that idea of structural adjustment programs. 307 00:16:26.000 --> 00:16:29.600 I mean, basically what we do is we tell developing nations that 308 00:16:29.600 --> 00:16:35.120 are in debt that they should cut their budgets for agriculture 309 00:16:35.120 --> 00:16:39.880 and for health and for education so they can pay down their debt 310 00:16:39.880 --> 00:16:40.560 load. 311 00:16:40.560 --> 00:16:44.180 So that's just sacrificing the future for the past. 312 00:16:44.180 --> 00:16:46.400 I mean, that's just driving them into a cycle 313 00:16:46.400 --> 00:16:47.753 of further impoverishment. 314 00:16:47.753 --> 00:16:49.920 Every once in a while, we'll cut them a little break 315 00:16:49.920 --> 00:16:51.220 and restructure the debt load. 316 00:16:51.220 --> 00:16:54.680 But we never let them get out from under our thumb. 317 00:16:54.680 --> 00:16:57.430 And so as a result of that, that just 318 00:16:57.430 --> 00:17:01.090 weakens agricultural sectors in these developing nations. 319 00:17:01.090 --> 00:17:04.290 They don't have funds for irrigation system and for seeds. 320 00:17:04.290 --> 00:17:06.052 They don't get credit. 321 00:17:06.052 --> 00:17:07.510 And if they don't have credit, they 322 00:17:07.510 --> 00:17:09.910 can't buy the materials they need for the next growing 323 00:17:09.910 --> 00:17:10.750 season. 324 00:17:10.750 --> 00:17:13.430 And then they become even more dependent on imports 325 00:17:13.430 --> 00:17:15.950 from the West, heavily subsidized imports 326 00:17:15.950 --> 00:17:17.065 from the West. 327 00:17:17.065 --> 00:17:18.690 So then they get in a really bad cycle. 328 00:17:18.690 --> 00:17:21.310 And then where will all those farmers go? 329 00:17:21.310 --> 00:17:23.450 Well, then that's a big demographic move. 330 00:17:23.450 --> 00:17:25.150 They move to the cities. 331 00:17:25.150 --> 00:17:27.650 They look for opportunities, but it's not good urbanization. 332 00:17:27.650 --> 00:17:30.230 It's not urbanization from the 19th century in the United 333 00:17:30.230 --> 00:17:33.310 States or in England where people moved to the cities 334 00:17:33.310 --> 00:17:34.730 because there were jobs. 335 00:17:34.730 --> 00:17:36.313 These people are moving to the cities. 336 00:17:36.313 --> 00:17:39.470 And they're just living in slums, these informal housing 337 00:17:39.470 --> 00:17:41.710 settlements with poor sanitation. 338 00:17:41.710 --> 00:17:44.830 And so that's bad for their health. 339 00:17:44.830 --> 00:17:46.990 So now you have bad health on both sides 340 00:17:46.990 --> 00:17:52.830 of the globe driven by the same economic incentive: farm 341 00:17:52.830 --> 00:17:53.650 subsidies. 342 00:17:53.650 --> 00:17:56.482 343 00:17:56.482 --> 00:17:58.040 And do I say go on? 344 00:17:58.040 --> 00:17:59.060 It's even worse. 345 00:17:59.060 --> 00:18:02.320 Then what we do if we don't dump all the excess food on them, 346 00:18:02.320 --> 00:18:04.960 we give it to them as food aid, which is so cynical. 347 00:18:04.960 --> 00:18:12.500 That's just a payoff to the shipping industry [laughs] 348 00:18:12.500 --> 00:18:14.100 and all the-- 349 00:18:14.100 --> 00:18:14.600 everything. 350 00:18:14.600 --> 00:18:16.080 We don't even know all this stuff. 351 00:18:16.080 --> 00:18:17.788 It has to be shipped to the United States 352 00:18:17.788 --> 00:18:19.580 on US flag vessels. 353 00:18:19.580 --> 00:18:22.120 And then how can they compete? 354 00:18:22.120 --> 00:18:24.580 How can a country like Ethiopia compete 355 00:18:24.580 --> 00:18:27.220 against food that's free? 356 00:18:27.220 --> 00:18:29.580 I mean, so that's putting their farmers even further out 357 00:18:29.580 --> 00:18:30.280 of business. 358 00:18:30.280 --> 00:18:32.420 So they're getting food aid delivered to them 359 00:18:32.420 --> 00:18:35.820 while they have warehouses full of their own rotting 360 00:18:35.820 --> 00:18:38.260 domestic food products. 361 00:18:38.260 --> 00:18:41.000 How would you feel about that if you were an Ethiopian farmer? 362 00:18:41.000 --> 00:18:43.940 So these two journalists, these guys from New York Times, 363 00:18:43.940 --> 00:18:45.500 Thoreau and-- 364 00:18:45.500 --> 00:18:47.040 no, the Wall Street Journal. 365 00:18:47.040 --> 00:18:50.500 They were Wall Street Journal journalists, Roger Thoreau 366 00:18:50.500 --> 00:18:53.380 and something Keilman wrote a book called Enough where they 367 00:18:53.380 --> 00:18:55.450 talked about this from 2013. 368 00:18:55.450 --> 00:18:59.930 They talked about how we're shipping food aid to Ethiopia 369 00:18:59.930 --> 00:19:02.610 while they have plenty of food. 370 00:19:02.610 --> 00:19:05.050 But why would their people buy their food? 371 00:19:05.050 --> 00:19:07.950 Why not just dig a bag of free American grain? 372 00:19:07.950 --> 00:19:09.950 So the whole system is perverse. 373 00:19:09.950 --> 00:19:13.710 And the people who are winning are the big agribusinesses. 374 00:19:13.710 --> 00:19:15.590 If you want to really understand the system, 375 00:19:15.590 --> 00:19:17.590 you just have to follow the profits. 376 00:19:17.590 --> 00:19:19.850 And that's where the profits are. 377 00:19:19.850 --> 00:19:23.130 They are in the companies like Archer Daniels Midland 378 00:19:23.130 --> 00:19:28.530 and Cargill and Smithfield that control the whole supply 379 00:19:28.530 --> 00:19:33.050 chain from the farm to the distribution center. 380 00:19:33.050 --> 00:19:37.690 And they're the winners because they 381 00:19:37.690 --> 00:19:42.490 add value [laughs] along every step of this increasingly 382 00:19:42.490 --> 00:19:45.790 complex globalized supply chain that works for them, 383 00:19:45.790 --> 00:19:48.530 but not so much for everybody else, I think. 384 00:19:48.530 --> 00:19:50.333 That's it for this edition of CIBER Focus. 385 00:19:50.333 --> 00:19:52.750 If you have any comments or suggestions for future topics, 386 00:19:52.750 --> 00:19:56.200 please let us know at ciber@indiana.edu.
