IU CIBER truly embraces its role as a national resource center, ensuring that resources and opportunities are made available to the widest audience possible when addressing the leading research in international business education. Our activities are directed toward moving all constituencies from international awareness, to engagement, and to global competence through the provision of international education, collaborative and mentorship relationships, and experiential learning.
CIBER Events
There are no events at this time.
CIBER Focus tackles topics impacting international business and international business education.
Description of the video:
WEBVTT 1 00:00:34.875 --> 00:00:37.075 Greetings, welcome to Cyber Focus, your source 2 00:00:37.075 --> 00:00:38.675 for international business information. 3 00:00:39.295 --> 00:00:40.555 I'm your host, Ryan Craven, 4 00:00:40.555 --> 00:00:42.435 and our guest today is Professor Andrew Lippy. 5 00:00:43.275 --> 00:00:44.935 Andrew Libby is the Assistant Director 6 00:00:45.075 --> 00:00:46.815 of the Human Biology Program at iu. 7 00:00:47.165 --> 00:00:49.735 This program is an interdisciplinary major in the College 8 00:00:49.735 --> 00:00:50.735 of Arts and Sciences 9 00:00:50.885 --> 00:00:52.215 that explores the complex human 10 00:00:52.215 --> 00:00:53.615 dimensions of scientific inquiry. 11 00:00:54.435 --> 00:00:56.935 His current teaching interests revolve around poverty, 12 00:00:57.125 --> 00:00:59.215 globalization, and the role 13 00:00:59.235 --> 00:01:01.615 of global financial institutions like the World Bank 14 00:01:01.615 --> 00:01:02.975 International Monetary Fund, 15 00:01:02.995 --> 00:01:05.335 and the World Trade Organization in International 16 00:01:05.335 --> 00:01:06.815 Development and Emerging Markets. 17 00:01:07.545 --> 00:01:10.895 Prior to this position in the HUBI, Andrew served 18 00:01:10.895 --> 00:01:12.255 as the community Engagement Coordinator 19 00:01:12.255 --> 00:01:13.695 for the IU service learning program, 20 00:01:14.155 --> 00:01:15.255 and he has a strong commitment 21 00:01:15.455 --> 00:01:18.335 to interdisciplinary experiential teaching and learning. 22 00:01:18.875 --> 00:01:20.175 Andrew, thanks for being here. 23 00:01:20.475 --> 00:01:21.735 So you're getting ready to teach the 24 00:01:21.965 --> 00:01:23.695 intensive Freshman seminar course. 25 00:01:24.115 --> 00:01:27.095 You know, food for Thought Food Policy from local to global. 26 00:01:27.555 --> 00:01:31.535 Uh, kinda what is that intensive seminar style, 27 00:01:31.635 --> 00:01:33.255 and then tell us a little bit about that, that program. 28 00:01:34.435 --> 00:01:37.295 Uh, yeah. The Intensive Freshman Seminar program is a 29 00:01:37.295 --> 00:01:41.335 really, I think, unique, I think neat program here at IU 30 00:01:41.785 --> 00:01:46.415 where incoming freshmen, um, will come in 31 00:01:46.415 --> 00:01:47.735 and take a seminar class. 32 00:01:47.845 --> 00:01:50.135 It's usually about two and a half to three weeks, 33 00:01:50.795 --> 00:01:52.975 and you can take it on a variety of topics. 34 00:01:53.225 --> 00:01:54.815 There are like maybe 20 35 00:01:55.475 --> 00:01:59.895 or 20 plus intensive freshman seminars offered from 36 00:02:00.285 --> 00:02:03.495 disciplines all across the U University. 37 00:02:03.955 --> 00:02:07.335 Um, and the topics range wildly. 38 00:02:08.235 --> 00:02:10.175 My class is called Food for Thought, 39 00:02:10.275 --> 00:02:13.575 and I'm part of the Human Biology program in the College 40 00:02:13.575 --> 00:02:14.695 of Arts and Sciences. 41 00:02:15.235 --> 00:02:18.015 My class is on the industrialization of food 42 00:02:18.435 --> 00:02:20.455 and its effects locally and globally. 43 00:02:21.085 --> 00:02:23.775 Awesome. Um, you know, what, 44 00:02:23.805 --> 00:02:25.535 what makes this topic so interesting to you? 45 00:02:27.355 --> 00:02:29.325 Yeah, that's a good question. 46 00:02:29.985 --> 00:02:33.685 Um, yeah, I think came by this in a winding way. 47 00:02:33.885 --> 00:02:36.005 I was mainly interested in globalization. 48 00:02:36.605 --> 00:02:37.965 I was interested in the role 49 00:02:38.065 --> 00:02:39.965 of the International Monetary Fund 50 00:02:40.785 --> 00:02:44.605 and the structural adjustment programs that they broker 51 00:02:44.605 --> 00:02:45.885 with developing nations. 52 00:02:46.465 --> 00:02:49.565 And I just was looking at the flows of capital 53 00:02:49.985 --> 00:02:53.005 and it seemed to me that they were replicating the, the time 54 00:02:53.005 --> 00:02:56.845 of colonialism where developing nations were paying huge 55 00:02:56.845 --> 00:03:00.765 amounts of debt to their, uh, creditors, 56 00:03:01.055 --> 00:03:03.605 which were mainly developed nations. 57 00:03:04.105 --> 00:03:06.245 And I started to see how 58 00:03:06.245 --> 00:03:09.325 that had a really negative effect on farmers, 59 00:03:09.875 --> 00:03:11.765 subsistence farmers, especially in some 60 00:03:11.765 --> 00:03:13.885 of the poorest nations on the earth. 61 00:03:14.225 --> 00:03:16.365 And these policies seemed, 62 00:03:17.265 --> 00:03:19.285 if not designed intentionally, 63 00:03:19.765 --> 00:03:22.765 although designed intentionally, um, to kind 64 00:03:22.765 --> 00:03:25.045 of squeeze these economies 65 00:03:25.265 --> 00:03:27.565 and it depleted their infrastructure 66 00:03:28.545 --> 00:03:30.325 and made it really difficult to be a, 67 00:03:30.405 --> 00:03:32.245 a farmer in these nations. 68 00:03:32.945 --> 00:03:37.715 And, um, that might not matter so much in the United States. 69 00:03:37.995 --> 00:03:39.915 'cause like, who's a farmer? We have like, I don't know, 70 00:03:39.915 --> 00:03:43.075 2 million farmers, 2% of the population. 71 00:03:43.675 --> 00:03:45.435 I think maybe my math isn't so good, 72 00:03:45.435 --> 00:03:48.435 but I think it's 2% of the population are farmers now. 73 00:03:48.695 --> 00:03:51.115 But in developing nations, you have somewhat times upwards 74 00:03:51.115 --> 00:03:52.395 of 60, 70% 75 00:03:52.855 --> 00:03:55.555 of the population engaged in engaged subsistence 76 00:03:55.555 --> 00:03:58.715 agriculture, and a lot of times these are women, 77 00:03:58.815 --> 00:04:01.315 so these are issues that really affect food 78 00:04:01.615 --> 00:04:03.315 and globalization really affect people in 79 00:04:03.315 --> 00:04:04.715 poverty and women in poverty. 80 00:04:04.855 --> 00:04:07.595 And so I thought that was sort of an interesting topic 81 00:04:07.855 --> 00:04:09.195 to start to think about. 82 00:04:10.425 --> 00:04:11.425 Yeah. 83 00:04:11.735 --> 00:04:14.375 Were there any, uh, standouts that kind 84 00:04:14.455 --> 00:04:17.135 of just really kind of blew your reminder, just was kind 85 00:04:17.135 --> 00:04:20.015 of a wow factor, um, when you initially started kind 86 00:04:20.015 --> 00:04:22.975 of taking this approach with really the the food lens? 87 00:04:24.245 --> 00:04:25.455 Yeah. There were two books. 88 00:04:25.515 --> 00:04:27.935 And are you, are you suggest asking about books 89 00:04:28.035 --> 00:04:30.415 or other texts or experiences I've had? 90 00:04:31.405 --> 00:04:34.135 Yeah, really just whatever, you know, kind 91 00:04:34.135 --> 00:04:35.855 of something you came across and it was just really kinda 92 00:04:35.855 --> 00:04:37.295 eye-opening and um, 93 00:04:37.885 --> 00:04:40.215 Yeah, like Piqued that interest even more. 94 00:04:40.845 --> 00:04:42.895 Yeah. Two, two books really. 95 00:04:43.475 --> 00:04:47.015 Uh, one, I don't know if you know Joseph Steitz, 96 00:04:47.125 --> 00:04:48.255 he's an economist. 97 00:04:48.475 --> 00:04:51.135 He was the chairman of Clinton's Council 98 00:04:51.295 --> 00:04:52.575 of Economic Advisors. 99 00:04:54.165 --> 00:04:57.135 He's no chump. He's got a Nobel Prize in economics. 100 00:04:57.595 --> 00:05:00.095 Um, he teaches at Princeton 101 00:05:00.875 --> 00:05:04.095 and I really, he wrote a book called Globalization 102 00:05:04.115 --> 00:05:05.295 and it's Discontent, 103 00:05:05.315 --> 00:05:08.495 and it was published in like 2001, maybe 104 00:05:09.125 --> 00:05:10.215 something like that. 105 00:05:11.315 --> 00:05:13.815 And he really 106 00:05:14.805 --> 00:05:17.655 explained in an accessible way for someone like me 107 00:05:17.655 --> 00:05:21.375 who was new to the topic of 21st century globalization, um, 108 00:05:22.505 --> 00:05:25.715 what structural adjustment programs were, how they operated 109 00:05:27.255 --> 00:05:28.775 historically, what they emerged from, 110 00:05:29.025 --> 00:05:31.455 which is something called the Washington Consensus, 111 00:05:31.455 --> 00:05:34.255 which was something developed by Ronald Reagan 112 00:05:34.355 --> 00:05:36.575 and Mark Thatcher in the eighties. 113 00:05:37.435 --> 00:05:41.115 Um, and it was part of a general global push 114 00:05:41.255 --> 00:05:42.435 to liberalize trade 115 00:05:43.575 --> 00:05:48.135 and to encourage globalization, I think enactment 116 00:05:48.295 --> 00:05:51.975 of nafta, the WTO in the nineties sort of followed 117 00:05:52.845 --> 00:05:53.895 logically from this, 118 00:05:53.915 --> 00:05:55.895 but there was sort of a, like a little bit of a dark side 119 00:05:55.915 --> 00:05:58.085 to the story of like happy globalization. 120 00:05:58.505 --> 00:06:00.125 And so Steve pointed that out, 121 00:06:00.505 --> 00:06:02.725 but I thought he did it in a kind of even handed way. 122 00:06:02.865 --> 00:06:06.085 He didn't, um, he talked about some of the triumphs 123 00:06:06.085 --> 00:06:08.045 of globalization as well as some of the 124 00:06:08.645 --> 00:06:10.045 negative consequences of it. 125 00:06:10.345 --> 00:06:11.885 And he used a really interesting phrase. 126 00:06:11.945 --> 00:06:13.645 He said, he is like globalization. 127 00:06:14.025 --> 00:06:15.925 He is like, it's a neutral term. 128 00:06:16.195 --> 00:06:18.125 He's like, it's not a good term or a bad term. 129 00:06:18.225 --> 00:06:19.965 You can have good globalization 130 00:06:20.105 --> 00:06:21.965 and you can have bad globalization. 131 00:06:22.205 --> 00:06:23.205 I thought that was interesting. 132 00:06:23.705 --> 00:06:28.245 And I think the food system is an example of 133 00:06:28.825 --> 00:06:30.925 bad globalization, um, 134 00:06:30.925 --> 00:06:34.005 because it's driven by perverse economic incentives. 135 00:06:34.155 --> 00:06:37.605 It's, it's sort of a, it's a, it's a market system 136 00:06:37.745 --> 00:06:41.685 that's dominated by subsidies from western nations. 137 00:06:41.705 --> 00:06:43.125 And I usually think about the United States, 138 00:06:43.225 --> 00:06:45.845 but you could also think about the European Union as well. 139 00:06:45.865 --> 00:06:47.445 And these are the most developed 140 00:06:48.405 --> 00:06:49.925 economic regions of the globe. 141 00:06:50.555 --> 00:06:52.165 They're the ones that subsidize the 142 00:06:52.325 --> 00:06:53.805 agricultural most heavily. 143 00:06:54.745 --> 00:06:57.685 And this really distorts the market in a lot of ways, 144 00:06:57.755 --> 00:07:00.765 both in terms of what ends up on our plate here in 145 00:07:00.995 --> 00:07:04.165 Bloomington, Indiana, as well as the opportunity 146 00:07:04.225 --> 00:07:06.565 for people in developing nations in emerging markets 147 00:07:06.745 --> 00:07:10.965 to have, uh, you know, a successful secure 148 00:07:12.075 --> 00:07:14.485 food system that's sort of localized 149 00:07:15.065 --> 00:07:18.165 and not so vulnerable to kind 150 00:07:18.165 --> 00:07:20.845 of exogenous shocks on a globalized supply chain. 151 00:07:21.865 --> 00:07:25.085 And so, uh, that was one book. So Steve was amazing. 152 00:07:25.385 --> 00:07:27.405 Uh, he's just amazing and he's an economist. 153 00:07:27.405 --> 00:07:29.285 He could have written a book filled with formulas 154 00:07:29.285 --> 00:07:31.125 that nobody could understand, 155 00:07:31.225 --> 00:07:33.445 but he didn't, he wrote a book that like, I mean, 156 00:07:33.445 --> 00:07:35.565 I think he really wanted people to see this. 157 00:07:36.545 --> 00:07:40.125 Uh, and then Michael Pollan, who's a very popular author, 158 00:07:40.825 --> 00:07:43.205 uh, journalism professor 159 00:07:44.025 --> 00:07:47.405 and food writer at Berkeley, at uc, Berkeley, um, 160 00:07:48.065 --> 00:07:50.405 who actually came and spoke at IU a few years ago, 161 00:07:50.425 --> 00:07:51.765 it interesting talk. 162 00:07:52.065 --> 00:07:54.485 Um, he wrote a book called The Omnivores Dilemma, 163 00:07:54.775 --> 00:07:58.725 which I read, and the premise of his book is so interesting. 164 00:07:58.785 --> 00:08:01.285 He basically says like, gee, I wonder what's in my food. 165 00:08:01.945 --> 00:08:04.725 And he is like, and he looked at the ingredients, he's, 166 00:08:05.125 --> 00:08:07.165 I can't actually tell what's in my food. 167 00:08:07.705 --> 00:08:09.365 Who knows. So he did like an investigation 168 00:08:09.365 --> 00:08:12.045 to figure out like kind of what's in his McDonald's 169 00:08:12.585 --> 00:08:13.965 Big Mac and Coke. 170 00:08:14.265 --> 00:08:16.805 And it turns out that a lot of this, a lot of the answer to 171 00:08:16.805 --> 00:08:21.245 that was most of the ingredients are based are, are 172 00:08:21.915 --> 00:08:23.485 corn and soy based. 173 00:08:23.705 --> 00:08:27.645 And so he kinda, his book helped explain to me something 174 00:08:27.645 --> 00:08:28.805 that was right in front of my face 175 00:08:28.805 --> 00:08:30.405 that didn't make any sense to me, which is 176 00:08:30.705 --> 00:08:32.565 who in the world is eating all this corn? 177 00:08:33.175 --> 00:08:34.465 Because I live in Indiana 178 00:08:35.325 --> 00:08:37.825 and I see corn every time I leave Bloomington 179 00:08:37.885 --> 00:08:39.785 and go like 30 miles in any direction. 180 00:08:39.895 --> 00:08:41.705 There's nothing but corn in soy fields. 181 00:08:42.345 --> 00:08:44.625 I only eat a little bit of corn. So who's eating it all? 182 00:08:44.805 --> 00:08:47.625 So pollen explain how the system works, 183 00:08:47.805 --> 00:08:49.705 how corn is just a commodity crop 184 00:08:56.375 --> 00:08:58.535 formulations that you see on the back 185 00:08:58.535 --> 00:09:01.095 of all the processed food that you like, dextrose 186 00:09:01.395 --> 00:09:05.535 and this stuff and sobe and xantham gum 187 00:09:05.555 --> 00:09:06.895 and all that, that's all corn. 188 00:09:07.115 --> 00:09:09.135 And so pollen kind of puts it all together 189 00:09:09.675 --> 00:09:10.895 on the domestic front. 190 00:09:11.035 --> 00:09:13.015 So all of a sudden I started to see pollen 191 00:09:13.015 --> 00:09:14.815 and GL kind of coming together. 192 00:09:15.715 --> 00:09:17.295 Uh, and that was really interesting. 193 00:09:17.915 --> 00:09:19.415 And then I worked at the food bank, 194 00:09:19.875 --> 00:09:22.215 and so I saw people who didn't have enough food to eat 195 00:09:22.215 --> 00:09:24.255 or who had plenty of food to eat, 196 00:09:24.255 --> 00:09:25.495 but it was all terrible for them. 197 00:09:26.125 --> 00:09:28.665 And I started to think about poor people and their diet 198 00:09:29.045 --> 00:09:32.705 and the obesity rates as it affects people in poverty. 199 00:09:33.485 --> 00:09:35.985 And started to think about how our food system is a huge 200 00:09:36.245 --> 00:09:37.265 set of trade-offs. 201 00:09:37.965 --> 00:09:41.465 And so that kind of intersection between food, globalization 202 00:09:41.485 --> 00:09:45.025 and poverty emerged from that kind of nexus 203 00:09:45.025 --> 00:09:46.345 of texts and experience. 204 00:09:47.175 --> 00:09:50.545 Well, and, and you mentioned it too, um, that 205 00:09:52.045 --> 00:09:54.825 so much of, you know, the populations in some of these areas 206 00:09:54.925 --> 00:09:57.185 and markets, um, is 207 00:09:57.325 --> 00:09:59.545 and you know, the agricultural side and the food side. 208 00:09:59.965 --> 00:10:02.625 And so we look at it in those terms too. 209 00:10:03.095 --> 00:10:05.825 This conversation is such a huge economic impact 210 00:10:06.645 --> 00:10:07.905 for those regions and areas. 211 00:10:08.685 --> 00:10:11.385 You know, kind getting back to kind of what's grown and, 212 00:10:11.385 --> 00:10:14.145 and why, and you know, it's, so much of it is determined 213 00:10:14.145 --> 00:10:17.505 by factors that aren't necessarily the local environment. 214 00:10:17.925 --> 00:10:20.305 You know, is this the right food 215 00:10:20.365 --> 00:10:21.905 for really everybody to be eating? 216 00:10:22.205 --> 00:10:24.665 And you know, kind of beyond nutrition, uh, you know, 217 00:10:24.665 --> 00:10:27.825 are there any anything that any, you know, key policies 218 00:10:28.045 --> 00:10:29.345 or, you know, any kind of part of that process 219 00:10:29.345 --> 00:10:31.305 that really stand out, that kind of showcase that for you? 220 00:10:32.215 --> 00:10:35.265 Yeah, I mean, to me the prime mover in the whole 221 00:10:35.265 --> 00:10:36.745 system is subsidies. 222 00:10:36.925 --> 00:10:38.625 So much goes back to subsidies. 223 00:10:38.625 --> 00:10:41.385 We subsidize our agribusinesses to the tune 224 00:10:41.405 --> 00:10:43.585 of $20 billion a year. 225 00:10:44.725 --> 00:10:49.385 Um, and what that gets us, what we're paying 226 00:10:49.565 --> 00:10:54.145 for there is the overproduction of just a small select set 227 00:10:54.145 --> 00:10:58.785 of crops like corn, soy, wheat, rice and cotton. 228 00:10:59.685 --> 00:11:02.385 And so, um, we get, 229 00:11:02.925 --> 00:11:04.825 we get the processed food 230 00:11:05.995 --> 00:11:09.925 that comes from those basic ingredients. 231 00:11:10.105 --> 00:11:13.605 But if we subsidize something different, 232 00:11:14.425 --> 00:11:19.285 if we subsidize tomatoes, we'd have a lot of tomatoes. 233 00:11:19.385 --> 00:11:21.725 If we subsidize the things that were healthy 234 00:11:22.065 --> 00:11:25.485 and are good for us, then we would have those 235 00:11:26.025 --> 00:11:29.565 things more available to us at a cheaper price. 236 00:11:29.945 --> 00:11:32.445 And the stuff that, the stuff that's bad for us 237 00:11:33.175 --> 00:11:37.035 would be more expensive, but you don't see it. 238 00:11:37.035 --> 00:11:41.635 That's why they can add like 79 ounces of coke to your cup 239 00:11:41.735 --> 00:11:43.075 for like an extra penny 240 00:11:44.215 --> 00:11:47.385 because the raw ingredient, you know, 241 00:11:47.385 --> 00:11:51.505 high fructose corn syrup is nothing, nothing on the dollar, 242 00:11:51.775 --> 00:11:53.605 pennies on the dollar dollar. 243 00:11:53.605 --> 00:11:56.165 And so it would be great if we reoriented our 244 00:11:56.165 --> 00:11:57.445 federal subsidy system. 245 00:11:58.005 --> 00:12:01.705 A lot of these questions are questions of poverty, you know, 246 00:12:02.225 --> 00:12:04.225 I mean, people eat what they can afford. 247 00:12:04.525 --> 00:12:06.985 So, but that's also, that's an appealing part 248 00:12:06.985 --> 00:12:09.185 of the food system to me too, is like, this is a, 249 00:12:09.185 --> 00:12:12.025 this is an area of poverty that I think we, if we, 250 00:12:12.405 --> 00:12:13.945 if we thought about our priorities 251 00:12:13.965 --> 00:12:16.425 and we prioritize public health, um, 252 00:12:16.745 --> 00:12:18.545 I think we could have an effect on the system. 253 00:12:18.775 --> 00:12:21.625 This is not like an intractable impossible problem. 254 00:12:22.525 --> 00:12:24.495 This is the problem with good, 255 00:12:24.885 --> 00:12:28.975 good potential solutions all oriented around trying 256 00:12:28.975 --> 00:12:32.455 to localize our food system just a little bit more. 257 00:12:32.835 --> 00:12:36.375 And we don't all have to like survive on berries and twigs, 258 00:12:37.395 --> 00:12:41.175 but we've got a system that's really, really industrialized. 259 00:12:42.325 --> 00:12:44.585 Um, and we could probably do a little bit 260 00:12:45.165 --> 00:12:48.865 of shifting back towards the way the food system used to be. 261 00:12:50.165 --> 00:12:52.945 But one of the, one of the obstacles to that is 262 00:12:52.945 --> 00:12:54.665 that we pay not very much 263 00:12:54.685 --> 00:12:58.945 for our food now we pay just like 12% of our annual income 264 00:12:59.005 --> 00:13:00.185 as a household for food. 265 00:13:00.185 --> 00:13:03.185 Whereas 50, 75 years ago we paid like a third of our income. 266 00:13:04.245 --> 00:13:08.905 So, you know, we get what we pay for nowadays, we get, uh, 267 00:13:08.965 --> 00:13:10.465 excess of unhealthy abundance. 268 00:13:11.315 --> 00:13:13.605 Yeah. Does um, you know, we kind of talked, been circling 269 00:13:13.605 --> 00:13:15.005 around it, uh, a little bit, 270 00:13:15.105 --> 00:13:18.605 but, um, you're starting to see a little bit more of a, 271 00:13:18.685 --> 00:13:21.485 a trend towards kinda locally sourced food, um, 272 00:13:21.745 --> 00:13:24.085 and eating, you know, what your local farmers 273 00:13:24.265 --> 00:13:26.205 and your environment can kind of produce 274 00:13:26.265 --> 00:13:28.365 and your own regions, you know, is 275 00:13:28.365 --> 00:13:31.205 that kind of the right direction? Um, that's 276 00:13:31.205 --> 00:13:32.205 Amazing. That's 277 00:13:32.205 --> 00:13:33.645 what we should, that'd be great. 278 00:13:33.995 --> 00:13:36.405 Kind of circling back over to the, to the policy piece 279 00:13:36.405 --> 00:13:39.525 of it a little bit, um, you know, kind of what gets made 280 00:13:39.525 --> 00:13:41.125 and, and you've spoken to it a little bit already, 281 00:13:41.145 --> 00:13:43.645 but you know, you know, kind 282 00:13:43.645 --> 00:13:46.205 of the international trade factor of kind 283 00:13:46.325 --> 00:13:48.885 of the food policy in, in kind of its influence. 284 00:13:49.665 --> 00:13:52.685 Do you think that, uh, you think that the, you know, 285 00:13:53.065 --> 00:13:54.965 the kind of the current COVID, you know, 286 00:13:55.845 --> 00:13:58.845 situation kind showcases that, that value that, you know, 287 00:13:58.945 --> 00:14:01.085 the benefits of that locally sourced food? 288 00:14:02.955 --> 00:14:04.755 I don't, I don't know. 289 00:14:05.355 --> 00:14:09.035 I mean, I've been kind of looking at newspaper articles 290 00:14:09.095 --> 00:14:11.155 or just whatever's on my newsfeed 291 00:14:11.255 --> 00:14:13.875 and like trying to see if there seem like there are stories 292 00:14:13.875 --> 00:14:15.035 about food shortages. 293 00:14:15.695 --> 00:14:18.035 And I have not really seen anything like that 294 00:14:18.995 --> 00:14:20.115 anywhere across the globe. 295 00:14:21.175 --> 00:14:25.955 So I don't, I have not seen the co COVID has not disrupted 296 00:14:26.745 --> 00:14:29.115 markets in any way that I've noticed. 297 00:14:29.335 --> 00:14:31.555 But, um, I think 298 00:14:34.715 --> 00:14:36.845 what can happen is countries 299 00:14:36.845 --> 00:14:38.805 that don't have a strong agricultural sector, 300 00:14:38.805 --> 00:14:41.245 that they rely too heavily on imports 301 00:14:41.245 --> 00:14:44.245 because their own sector has been own agriculture, 302 00:14:44.285 --> 00:14:47.965 agricultural sector has been made uncompetitive for, 303 00:14:48.905 --> 00:14:52.085 you know, urban biased policies 304 00:14:52.305 --> 00:14:54.165 and commodity dumping and things like that. 305 00:14:54.595 --> 00:14:57.685 Then if there is a problem in the supply chain, like, 306 00:14:58.125 --> 00:14:59.125 I guess not COVID, 307 00:14:59.305 --> 00:15:02.965 but I'm thinking more like climate related problems, 308 00:15:03.765 --> 00:15:07.315 droughts, fires, floods. 309 00:15:08.155 --> 00:15:10.075 I know it was a really interest, really interesting story 310 00:15:10.075 --> 00:15:11.595 from a while ago from the Wall Street Journal. 311 00:15:11.595 --> 00:15:12.755 It's like 2010. 312 00:15:13.005 --> 00:15:17.805 There was like a heat wave across the 313 00:15:17.805 --> 00:15:20.685 wheat belt in Russia, so whatever part 314 00:15:20.685 --> 00:15:23.565 of Russia it is some part to the west 315 00:15:23.855 --> 00:15:24.965 where they grow lots of wheat. 316 00:15:25.145 --> 00:15:27.245 So Russia just kept all their wheat to themselves, 317 00:15:27.265 --> 00:15:29.525 so they didn't have as much to export. 318 00:15:30.265 --> 00:15:33.605 So countries that were dependent on Russian 319 00:15:34.695 --> 00:15:36.525 wheat exports all 320 00:15:36.525 --> 00:15:39.245 of a sudden found themselves very vulnerable, 321 00:15:40.225 --> 00:15:41.805 uh, to shortages. 322 00:15:41.805 --> 00:15:45.045 And in that case you did see kind of price spikes 323 00:15:45.825 --> 00:15:47.785 and riots 324 00:15:47.805 --> 00:15:49.385 and food riots, uh, 325 00:15:49.625 --> 00:15:53.185 I think in places pretty far away from Russia, 326 00:15:53.465 --> 00:15:57.585 I mean down in, in, in, I think in Africa, uh, north Africa. 327 00:15:58.005 --> 00:16:02.425 So, um, I think in terms of policy, it's probably good 328 00:16:03.325 --> 00:16:07.875 as international development policy for us 329 00:16:08.055 --> 00:16:11.595 to help developing nations build the infrastructure 330 00:16:12.025 --> 00:16:16.515 that they need to have a strong agricultural sector. 331 00:16:17.335 --> 00:16:19.515 Um, so, 332 00:16:19.975 --> 00:16:23.315 but we don't do that as far as I know, like going back to 333 00:16:23.315 --> 00:16:25.555 that idea of structural adjustment programs, 334 00:16:26.155 --> 00:16:29.475 I mean basically what we do is we tell developing nations 335 00:16:29.475 --> 00:16:33.195 that are in debt that they should cut their budgets for 336 00:16:33.945 --> 00:16:36.475 agriculture and for health 337 00:16:37.135 --> 00:16:39.875 and for education so they can pay down their debt load. 338 00:16:40.335 --> 00:16:43.795 So that's just sacrificing the future for the past. 339 00:16:44.195 --> 00:16:46.195 I mean, that's just driving them into a cycle 340 00:16:46.335 --> 00:16:47.955 of further impoverishment. 341 00:16:48.285 --> 00:16:49.875 Every once in a while we'll cut 'em a little break 342 00:16:49.875 --> 00:16:51.155 and restructure the debt load, 343 00:16:51.155 --> 00:16:53.155 but we never let 'em get out from under our thumb. 344 00:16:53.975 --> 00:16:57.755 Um, and so as a result of that, that just weakens 345 00:16:58.765 --> 00:16:59.925 agricultural sectors. 346 00:16:59.925 --> 00:17:01.645 These developing nations, they don't have funds 347 00:17:01.945 --> 00:17:05.285 for irrigation system and for seeds, they don't get credit. 348 00:17:06.265 --> 00:17:07.285 And if they don't have credit, 349 00:17:07.315 --> 00:17:09.045 they can't buy the materials they need 350 00:17:09.045 --> 00:17:10.245 for the next growing season. 351 00:17:10.745 --> 00:17:13.885 And then they become even more dependent on imports from the 352 00:17:13.885 --> 00:17:16.565 west, heavily subsidized imports from the west. 353 00:17:16.825 --> 00:17:18.325 So then they get in a really bad cycle. 354 00:17:18.385 --> 00:17:21.725 And then where all those farmers go, well then 355 00:17:21.725 --> 00:17:24.245 that's a big demographic move that's sort of, they move 356 00:17:24.245 --> 00:17:26.125 to the cities, they look for opportunities, 357 00:17:26.145 --> 00:17:27.525 but it's not good urbanization. 358 00:17:27.525 --> 00:17:29.605 It's not like urbanization from the 19th century 359 00:17:29.705 --> 00:17:32.845 and the United States or in England where people move 360 00:17:32.845 --> 00:17:34.045 to the cities because there were jobs. 361 00:17:34.415 --> 00:17:35.525 These people are moving to the cities 362 00:17:35.525 --> 00:17:37.765 and they're just living in slums, these 363 00:17:38.325 --> 00:17:41.165 informal housing settlements with poor sanitation. 364 00:17:41.825 --> 00:17:44.005 And so that's bad for their health. 365 00:17:44.765 --> 00:17:48.785 So now you have bad health on both sides of the globe driven 366 00:17:49.385 --> 00:17:53.375 by the same economic incentive, farm subsidies. 367 00:17:54.305 --> 00:17:57.885 So, uh, and do I, should I go on? 368 00:17:57.885 --> 00:18:00.045 It's even worse, man, what we do, 369 00:18:00.105 --> 00:18:02.525 if we don't dump all the excess food on them, we give it 370 00:18:02.525 --> 00:18:04.605 to 'em as food aid, which is so cynical. 371 00:18:04.605 --> 00:18:06.765 That's just a payoff to the, to the, 372 00:18:07.505 --> 00:18:12.205 to the shipping industry, uh, uh, 373 00:18:12.505 --> 00:18:14.525 and all the, all the everything. 374 00:18:14.525 --> 00:18:16.325 We don't even, you know, all the stuff it has 375 00:18:16.325 --> 00:18:19.125 to be shipped from the United States on us flag vessels. 376 00:18:19.665 --> 00:18:21.805 So, and then how can they compete? 377 00:18:21.805 --> 00:18:24.885 How can a country like Ethiopia compete against 378 00:18:25.315 --> 00:18:26.565 food that's free? 379 00:18:27.325 --> 00:18:29.045 I mean, so that's putting their farmers even 380 00:18:29.045 --> 00:18:30.085 further out of business. 381 00:18:30.225 --> 00:18:32.125 So they're getting food aid delivered 382 00:18:32.125 --> 00:18:34.285 to them while they have warehouses full 383 00:18:34.285 --> 00:18:37.685 of their own rotting domestic food products. 384 00:18:38.255 --> 00:18:40.605 How'd you feel about that if you're an Ethiopian farmer? 385 00:18:40.665 --> 00:18:43.525 So these two journalists, these guys from New York Times, 386 00:18:44.465 --> 00:18:46.885 tho and kil, no, the Wall Street Journal, 387 00:18:46.915 --> 00:18:50.405 they were Wall Street Journal journalists, Roger Thoreau 388 00:18:50.425 --> 00:18:52.805 and something, Kilman wrote a book called Enough 389 00:18:52.855 --> 00:18:55.325 where they talked about this from 2013. 390 00:18:55.325 --> 00:18:59.005 They talked about how we're shipping food aid to Ethiopia 391 00:18:59.655 --> 00:19:01.445 while they have plenty of food, 392 00:19:02.555 --> 00:19:04.335 but why would there people buy their food? 393 00:19:05.115 --> 00:19:07.495 Why not just dig a bag of free American grain? 394 00:19:07.915 --> 00:19:09.575 So the whole system is perverse 395 00:19:09.875 --> 00:19:13.535 and the people who are winning are the big agri businesses. 396 00:19:13.635 --> 00:19:16.095 If you wanna really understand the system, you just have 397 00:19:16.095 --> 00:19:19.295 to follow the profits, and that's where the profits are. 398 00:19:19.485 --> 00:19:22.615 They're in the companies like Archer Daniels, Midland 399 00:19:23.235 --> 00:19:24.415 and Cargill 400 00:19:24.955 --> 00:19:26.175 and Smithfield 401 00:19:26.525 --> 00:19:30.295 that control the whole supply chain from the farm 402 00:19:30.635 --> 00:19:32.455 to the distribution center. 403 00:19:33.155 --> 00:19:36.295 And, uh, they, and they're, they're the, they're the winners 404 00:19:36.415 --> 00:19:41.135 'cause they add, they add value along every step 405 00:19:41.515 --> 00:19:44.415 of this increasingly complex globalized supply chain 406 00:19:44.645 --> 00:19:46.455 that works for them, but not so much 407 00:19:46.455 --> 00:19:47.815 for everybody else. I think 408 00:19:48.395 --> 00:19:50.055 That's it for this edition of Cyber Focus. 409 00:19:50.275 --> 00:19:51.855 If you have any comments or suggestions 410 00:19:51.855 --> 00:19:53.335 for future topics, please let us know. 411 00:19:53.355 --> 00:19:55.975 At cyber@indiana.edu I.
